Petitioner was a probationary teacher with the New York City Department of Education and received a “U” rating. He appealed his “U” or unsatisfactory rating to the Chancllor’s committed and they denied his appeal. In his Article 78 filing he appealed the composition of the Chancellor’s committee but had failed to preserve his appeal by
U rating
Teacher’s “U” rating reversed after Article 78 lawsuit
By Kevin Sheerin on
Teacher received an “U” rating due to a number of factors including attendance and lateness for the 2010-2011 school year. She received unsatisfactory ratings in seven categories in her Annual Professinal Performance Review (APPR). Her principal wrote to her stating that improperly prepared paperwork would be considered and unsatisfactory rating.
As was her right the…
Termination of Probationary Teacher Based Upon Violated DOE Rules is Ordered Back to the DOE for Final Review and Recommendation
By Kevin Sheerin on
Posted in Teacher Issues
Termination of Probationary Teacher Based Upon Violated DOE Rules is Ordered Back to the DOE for Final Review and Recommendation…
Continue Reading Termination of Probationary Teacher Based Upon Violated DOE Rules is Ordered Back to the DOE for Final Review and Recommendation