Technician's Article 78 appeal is dismissed and his termination confirmed
Matter of Roth v Manhasset Union Free School District
Petitioner, Jeffrey S. Roth, commenced this Article 78 proceeding to review a determination of the Manhasset Union Free School District finding petitioner guilty of misconduct and incompetence and terminating his employment. The Supreme Court denied the petitioner and dismissed the proceeding to which petitioner appealed. Due to the fact that the petition raised a substantial evidence question, the Supreme Court should have transferred the proceeding to the Court and thus the Court treated the proceeding as if it had been properly transferred and reviewed the proceeding de novo.
Petitioner was an audio-visual technician for respondent. The School District charged him with numerous acts of misconduct including physically threatening other employees and making inappropriate sexual comments to students among other things. A hearing found petitioner guilty of 14 of the 16 charges against him. The determination under review was supported by substantial evidence and it is the function of the administrative agency or Hearing Officer and not the reviewing court to weigh the evidence. Also, the penalty of termination was not shocking to the judicial conscience.
Accordingly, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, vacated the judgment, confirmed the determination, denied the petition, dismissed the proceeding and awarded one bill of costs to the respondent.
To read further on this topic go to http://www.sheerinlaw.com/?id=78.
For other interesting information in the personal injury file go to www.negligenceatty.com.